Arwilda Jackson

Youth & Comm.Dev.Srv, Department of
Field Supervisor

View Arwilda Jackson Background Search

Arwilda Jackson Overview

Arwilda Jackson in 2010 was employed at Youth & Comm.Dev.Srv, Department of and had a reported pay of $3,744, according to public records. Arwilda Jackson reported rate of pay was $12 according to public records.

In year 2010 Arwilda Jackson's salary was 96 percent lower than average Field Supervisor salary in the state of New York.

Advertisement

Key Data

Year2010
Full NameArwilda Jackson
Job TitleField Supervisor
Get Field Supervisor Salary Statistics
StateNew York
EmployerYouth & Comm.Dev.Srv, Department of
Total Pay $3,744
Rate Of Pay$12
Pay BasisHourly

*Information may include where available: salary, bonuses, benefits, retirement contributions, pensions, and other financial data.

Advertisement

Employer

Employer NameYouth & Comm.Dev.Srv, Department of
Year2010
Number of Employees517
Average Annual Wage$53,729
Median Annual Wage$52,570
View Arwilda Jackson Background Search

Other records for Arwilda Jackson

Find More

Highest Paid with the Same Job Title (Field Supervisor)

Co-Workers

 (2010)
Field Supervisor at Youth & Comm.Dev.Srv, Department of
View Person Details
 (2010)
Field Supervisor at Youth & Comm.Dev.Srv, Department of
View Person Details
 (2010)
Field Supervisor at Youth & Comm.Dev.Srv, Department of
View Person Details
 (2010)
Field Supervisor at Youth & Comm.Dev.Srv, Department of
View Person Details
 (2010)
Field Supervisor at Youth & Comm.Dev.Srv, Department of
View Person Details
 (2010)
Field Supervisor at Youth & Comm.Dev.Srv, Department of
View Person Details
 (2010)
Field Supervisor at Youth & Comm.Dev.Srv, Department of
View Person Details
 (2010)
Field Supervisor at Youth & Comm.Dev.Srv, Department of
View Person Details
 (2010)
Senior Human Resources Specialist at Youth & Comm.Dev.Srv, Department of
View Person Details
 (2010)
Contract Specialist at Youth & Comm.Dev.Srv, Department of
View Person Details
Show All Employees of Youth & Comm.Dev.Srv, Department of
Advertisement